asked 83.9k views
4 votes
Suppose a utilitarian abolitionist argues that the death penalty is too costly to implement in a democratic society. a plausible nonconsequentialist reply is that

asked
User SWilk
by
7.8k points

1 Answer

7 votes
Non-Consequentialist answers contend that intercessions are unjustified for reasons having nothing to do with their outcomes. So we can say that the answer would be based on the problem is that the death penalty is a just punishment, then the costs involved do not matter.
answered
User Balthasar
by
8.4k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.