asked 104k views
1 vote
Larry and carol are tested twice on moral reasoning. the first time, kohlberg's measures are used and carol gets a lower score than larry. the second time, gilligan's approach is used and both individuals score at the same level, that of universal ethical principles (stage 6.) based on research reported in your text, what probably caused this discrepancy?

1 Answer

3 votes
The difference in their perspectives such that Kohlberg's approach is a justice perspective while Gilligan's is a care perspective.Both scales showed a predominance in the perspective strength of each.
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.