asked 48.6k views
0 votes
In the 2013 case of maryland v. king, the supreme court upheld that

1 Answer

4 votes
While being help in prison before conviction, King's DNA was logged and used in court. Unfortunately for King his DNA matched the DNA of a male who took a woman without her consent.

The supreme court ruled King's right to privacy (4th Amendment) was more critical than Maryland's interest in convicting him for his crime. Odd case.
answered
User Ricardo Costa
by
8.4k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.