asked 144k views
1 vote
(15 points)Why would a one year term for governor be ineffective?

asked
User The Hoff
by
7.6k points

2 Answers

3 votes
Many things take more than one year to accomplish. If a governor only had a 1 year term, they would not be able to accomplish much in such a short amount of time.
answered
User Anver Sadhat
by
8.6k points
6 votes

Answer:

One-year term for Governor may not suffice the requirement of implementing and exploring the various concepts.

Explanation:

  • Good governance describes how and why the decisions are made and implemented.
  • These can be understood in various characteristics like economy, education, finance, rule of law, transparency, effectiveness of any policy, accountability, development strategies, participation of various institutions.
  • These aspects of governance should be monitored from time to time and ensure that proper commitment, support, quality is provided.
  • Everything pertaining to this needs a stable framework which is enforced with impartiality and incorruptibility. So, in order to visualize the fruits of implementing such reforms, one-term for governor can be ineffective.
answered
User Ashish Mohan
by
8.4k points

No related questions found

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.