asked 55.7k views
4 votes
Jarvis left out a statement from the proof shown.which statement is best explained by the corresponding angles postulate

Jarvis left out a statement from the proof shown.which statement is best explained-example-1

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

∠1 ≅ ∠3

Step-by-step explanation:

Jarvis left out a statement from the proof shown. Which statement is best explained by the corresponding angles postulate?

answered
User Brian ONeil
by
8.9k points
6 votes
The postulate of the corresponding angles establishes that when a transversal line cuts two parallel lines, the corresponding angles are congruent. These angles are on the same side of the parallel lines and on the same side of the transversal line.

Then, if we based on this definition and analize the figure attached, we can notice that the angles ∠1 and ∠3 are corresponding angles, so they are congruent. In this case the angle ∠1 is internal and the angle ∠3 is external.

The answer is: ∠1 and ∠3 are congruent (See the image attached).
Jarvis left out a statement from the proof shown.which statement is best explained-example-1
answered
User Shirl
by
8.1k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.