asked 118k views
5 votes
What argument is Frisch making? This is the thesis statement

asked
User Vicente
by
7.9k points

2 Answers

5 votes
Demonstration of the atomic bomb before deploying it might have put pressure on Japan to surrender with minimal loss of life.
answered
User Reuben Cummings
by
8.9k points
1 vote

Frisch claims that his views on the atomic bomb were corroborated by his beliefs that had been influenced by his college studies, almost twenty years after the end of World War II. He further says that writing about the historical significance of the atomic bomb is best explained by the retrospective recognition of the mistakes made by scientists who worked on the Manhattan project. Frisch believes an atomic bomb should have been thrown to Germany, rather than to Japan, and that allies had other options to force the unconditional surrender of Japan. Scientists did not have experience in atomic particle physics to perform demostration before use, because any demonstrations would force Japan to surrender with minimal human losses, otherwise there was no way to avoid huge human losses by detonating atomic bombs.

answered
User Nickjb
by
8.4k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.