asked 117k views
1 vote
Briefly explain one major difference between mcpherson and horwitz historical interpretation

asked
User Zaxliu
by
7.8k points

2 Answers

6 votes
Some people wanted the slavery in the south to end meanwhile some didn't but at the same time the north which was not having this problem wanted everyone together as a nation. In fact, the south was divided into two factions those that needed to split far from the rest on account of slave laws. The Northern states attempted to keep the south to remain.
answered
User SeanJ
by
9.1k points
1 vote
Horwitz historical interpretation in civil war is similar to classic Evil vs good stories that focused on slavery and emancipation, with the north on the good side and the south on the abd side.
Mcpherson on the other hand, believe that the Southern chose to go to the war because their Comfort was threatened by the economic impact that slavery would cause to their economy.
answered
User Sergey Ushakov
by
8.5k points

Related questions

1 answer
0 votes
31.1k views
asked May 22, 2024 152k views
Beech asked May 22, 2024
by Beech
7.3k points
1 answer
1 vote
152k views
1 answer
0 votes
172k views
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.