asked 49.4k views
3 votes
In the process of proving that opposite sides of a parallelogram are congruent, Ross drew a diagonal of the parallelogram and determined that the two triangles formed are congruent. He then concluded that opposite sides must be congruent, because corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent.

Using his markings in the diagram, which postulate allowed him to determine that the two triangles formed are congruent?

A) AAS
B) ASA
C) SAS
D) SSS

In the process of proving that opposite sides of a parallelogram are congruent, Ross-example-1

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer:

B

Explanation:

answered
User Gvilarino
by
8.4k points
5 votes

Answer:

(B) ASA

Explanation:

we will verify each options

option-A:

we can see that there is no consecutive two angles

so, this postulates can not be true

so, this is FALSE

option-B:

We can see that

one angle and then side and another angle are equivalents

so, this is TRUE

option-C:

We can see that

one side and two angles are equivalents

so, this is FALSE

option-D:

we can see that

one side and two angles are equivalents

so, this is FALSE

answered
User Thilo Schwarz
by
8.7k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.