Question

Read this example:

Stean, Corrina. "Computers Declare Victory in the Battle of
Silicon Valley." New York Times. New York Times, 22 May
1995. Web. Retrieved June 4, 2013.

Why is this source considered to be weak?
A. It doesn't give a clear idea in the title of what the article will be about.
B. It was written over 20 years ago, and the information might be out of date.
C. It doesn't have a title that’s formal enough for readers to take seriously.
D. It was originally published on the Internet Instead of in a printed publication.

Answer 1

it is, It was written over 20 years ago, and the information might be out of date.

Step-by-step explanation:

I did it on a pex and it was the answer

Answer 2

The answer is:

B. It was written over 20 years ago, and the information might be out of date.

The article from the New York Times is not a strong source due to the fact it was written in 1995, twenty-three years ago. Since computers and technology have evolved amazingly in the latest years, the content of the writing might be obsolete in these times.