asked 23.9k views
0 votes
If miranda v Arizona 1966 why did Ernesto Miranda say his fifth amendment Rights had been violated

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

He had confessed to crimes without being reminded of his right to avoid self-incrimination.

Step-by-step explanation:

fwnofjwjjdw

jdjdjdjdjdjjdd

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

answered
User Vanza
by
8.0k points
2 votes

The Miranda v. Arizona case in 1966 was an important case for the US Supreme Court since it established that the rights of the accused were violated when interrogated by the police custody. Miranda was convicted and the case was appealed to the Supreme Court since according to the Fifth Amendment the accused cannot make self-incriminatory confessions. Therefore, the Supreme Court overturned Miranda’s conviction on the basis that his rights protected by the Fifth Amendment had been violated since he signed a written confession admitting the crime when he was under police custody.

answered
User MmBs
by
8.4k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.