asked 219k views
4 votes
The Sixth Amendment was interpreted in

Gideon v. Wainwright to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights
Gideon v. Wainwright to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it
Miranda v. Arizona to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights
Miranda v. Arizona to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it

asked
User Mororo
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

0 votes

The second option, Gideon v. Wainwright to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it

answered
User Aayush Mahajan
by
7.3k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.