asked 80.3k views
4 votes
In the figure, ∠1 ≅ ∠2, ∠3 ≅ ∠4, and . You can justify the conclusion that ∠TKL ≅ ∠TLK by stating _____

that complements of congruent angles are congruent.


the SAS Postulate.


the HL Theorem.


that supplements of congruent angles are congruent.

In the figure, ∠1 ≅ ∠2, ∠3 ≅ ∠4, and . You can justify the conclusion that ∠TKL ≅ ∠TLK-example-1
asked
User Tyrell
by
8.7k points

2 Answers

0 votes
The answer is "that supplements of congruent angles are congruent" because in order for the angles to be congruent to complete SAS their supplements must be congruent.
answered
User Torbatamas
by
8.3k points
1 vote
From the question, we know that we will be looking at <3, <4, and angles TKL and TLK. That being said, since <3 is congruent to <4, that means that angles TKL and TLK, which are each supplementary to either angle 3 or 4, are congruent because, since angles 3 and 4 are congruent, they are congruent because the supplements of congruent angles are congruent.
answered
User Statement
by
7.0k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.