Register

In Miranda v. _______ , the Supreme Court ruled that a person had to be told of his rights before having to answer any questions pertaining to his guilt or innocence. a. Colorad…

In Miranda v. _______ , the Supreme Court ruled that a person had to be told of his rights before having to answer any questions pertaining to his guilt or innocence. a. Colorad…
asked 231k views
5 votes
In Miranda v. _______ , the Supreme Court ruled that a person had to be told of his rights before having to answer any questions pertaining to his guilt or innocence.

a. Colorado
b. Arizona
c. California

asked
User Bad Loser
by
7.3k points

1 Answer

5 votes
the correct answer is Arizona 
answered
User Pranvera
by
8.0k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

User Pschueller
asked Jul 24, 2024 41.3k views
Which trial procedure is defined as the pronouncement of guilt or innocence?
Pschueller asked Jul 24, 2024
by Pschueller
7.2k points
1 answer
0 votes
41.3k views
Ask a Question
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.

Categories

Other Questions

is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
What were the positive and negative effects of Egypt being imperialized by Britain.
Link Copied!