asked 178k views
5 votes
PLEASE I NEED HELP

The Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court case concerned two students who wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. The school district suspended the students, possibly violating their right to free speech.

Which best summarizes the dissenting opinion?

A. It was proven that other students were allowed to wear controversial symbols, so their suspension was unconstitutional.
B. Because the armbands protested the Vietnam War, the lawsuit was actually a question of Second Amendment rights.
C. The Des Moines Supreme Court had already ruled in favor of the school to suspend the students.
D. Schools have reserved the right to limit expression in past cases and the armbands were, indeed, disruptive.

asked
User Flo Doe
by
8.4k points

2 Answers

1 vote
B) Their action was not disruptive
answered
User Hegash
by
8.5k points
5 votes
i think its should be b because the google has telled me that

answered
User Gregorio
by
7.6k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.