asked 219k views
0 votes
HELP:

In the Supreme Court case Dred Scott v. Sanford, what was Scott’s claim?

A. That he had been brutally treated by his owner and should be freed.

B. That his time in a free territory meant that he was a free man.

C. That he had been illegally captured in the North because of the Fugitive Slave Act.

D. That the Kansas-Nebraska Act must be repealed.

asked
User GordonW
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

i think its D. That the Kansas-Nebraska Act must be repealed.

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Strawtarget
by
7.7k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.