asked 70.1k views
1 vote
Although the Supreme Court generally defers to presidential actions, the Court was quite active in striking down presidential actions in this particular area of law, including cases such as Hamdi v.

A) Rumsfeld,
B) Hamdan v.
C) Rumsfeld,
D) Boumediene v.
E) Bush.

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer:

The answer are:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hamdi v. A) Rumsfeld,

B) Hamdan v.C) Rumsfeld,

Boumediene v. E) Bush.

This are all related to prisoner rights - in this particular area of law there were some exclusions.

answered
User Nihal Sharma
by
8.6k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.