Question

Which of the following is true about interpretive history? 1. interpretive history evaluates the evident and attempts to explain the how and the why of events that happened in the past 2. What makes interpretive history different that is descriptive history is that an interpretive about not only "what happened" but "why it happened" 3. Unlike descriptive history, interpretive history does not limit itself to "just the fact" but actually interprets history. 4. All of these

Answer 1

2 or B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

all

Step-by-step explanation:

im not too sure but the definition of interpret matches them up in my head