Question

A government passes a law increasing taxes on banks. Two days later, there

are several bank robberies. A politician who opposed the taxes claims that
the new law is causing bank robberies. Why is the politician's argument not
very convincing?
O
A. It fails to prove correlation.
O
B. It confuses correlation with causation.
O
C. It claims that the law has no good cause.
O
D. It establishes a historical narrative.

Answer 1

b. it confuses correlation with causation.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

B. It confuses correlation with causation.