Mikah is proving the base angles of this triangle are congruent. In isosceles triangle QRS, RT is the angle bisector of ∠QRS. Mikah begins the proof by stating ∠1≅∠2. What is a valid reason for this statement?

Mikah is proving the base angles of this triangle are congruent.

In isosceles triangle QRS, RT is the angle bisector of ∠QRS. Mikah begins the proof by stating ∠1≅∠2. What is a valid reason for this statement?

A. Definition of Angle Bisector

B. Reflexive Property of Congruence

C. Symmetric Property of Congruence

D. Corresponding angles are congruent.

Mikah is proving the base angles of this triangle are congruent. In isosceles triangle-example-1

1 Answer

Mikah is proving the base angles of this triangle are congruent. In isosceles triangle QRS, RT is the angle bisector of ∠QRS. Mikah begins the proof by stating ∠1≅∠2. What is a …

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Related questions

Categories

Other Questions