Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary sources have over primary sources for historians

Question

asked Mar 15, 2020 198k views

1 Answer

Jasper Risseeuw · Answer 1 · 2020-03-20T12:53:27+0000

Answer:

you did not include the choices, but heres a advantage:

usually research is already done, so it proves that it is able to do research on, therefore the historian can carry out more research.

Step-by-step explanation: