Question

Read this example: your paper is very unclear and you don’t properly support your claims with evidence. You should go back and rewrite this. Why is this considered an example of unhelpful feedback provided during the peer review process?

Answer 1

Answer:it focuses on the negative aspects of the paper

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

It is not concrete nor constructive.

Step-by-step explanation:

Peer review feedback should always aim at an honest, and as much as possible, cordial, critique of somebody´s work. Feedback should always be precise, that is to say, it should signal where exactly flaws are found; also, it should be constructive, not destructive, that is to say, it should give the author arguments on why certain fragments are flawed and give the author tools to fix these flaws.