Final answer:
The author would likely agree with a conclusion that not only restates the thesis but also encapsulates the main arguments and suggests implications or actions based on the evidence. Philosophical conclusions prioritize the synthesis of ideas rather than the mere presentation of proofs.
Step-by-step explanation:
To determine which statement the author would most likely agree with, we can infer specific conclusions based on their writing. Drawing from the provided information, where authors finishing with their own words, restating their thesis, and issuing calls to action are examples of conclusions, we can generalize what our author might agree with.
An author like Plato, who suggests that 'the idea of good appears last of all,' might conclude that the pursuit of knowledge invariably leads to the understanding of good. In a philosophical debate, a plausible criticism might be that asserting the primacy of good in the realm of knowledge could be considered subjective and not universally acceptable.
When crafting conclusions, it's crucial to build on evidence that has been accumulated throughout the argument. Conclusions are not proofs but educated inferences that summarize and encapsulate the overarching ideas presented in a work.
Given the examples, a reasonable conclusion the author could agree with might be: The final part of philosophical writing should not only summarize the argument but also affirm the thesis and suggest implications or actions that follow logically from the presented evidence.