asked 88.5k views
4 votes
A geometry teacher asked Radric to define "parallel lines." Radric said that parallel lines are lines in a plane that do not have any points in common. Is Radric's definition valid?

asked
User Nbryans
by
7.8k points

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer:

Radric answer is Right.

Explanation:

  • Radric said that the parallel lines are the lines in a plane that do not have any points in common.
  • He is right as he is talking about the lines in a plane i.e the line are not intersecting each other even till infinity .
  • It is not possible for two non-parallel lines not intersect each other in a plane at any point. Even, if there is a small deviation in the two lines they will intersect at some point in the plane.

So the Radric is right and his answer is valid.

answered
User Jorilallo
by
8.8k points
3 votes

Answer: The answer is Yes.

Step-by-step explanation: Given in the question that Radric was asked to define "parallel lines" and he said that parallel lines are lines in a plane that do not have any points in common. We are to decide whether Radric's definition is valid or not.

Parallel lines are defined as lines in a plane which never meets or any two lines in a plane which do not intersect each other at any point are called parallel.

Thus, Radric's definition is valid.

answered
User Giaour
by
8.0k points

No related questions found

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.