asked 143k views
3 votes
A man is arrested for a crime. At the police station, police question him, and he confesses. His lawyer later argues that the police should have informed the man he had the right to ask for a lawyer before speaking. The Supreme Court rules that the man, and others suspected of a crime, must be informed of their constitutional rights when they are arrested.

Which Supreme Court case does this summary describe?

A.
In re Gault
B.
Gideon v. Wainwright
C.
Tinker v. Des Moines
D.
Miranda v. Arizona

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:

C. Tinker v. des moines

I hope this is the correct answer

answered
User Crixo
by
7.8k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.