asked 11.9k views
0 votes
Steve determines that sides DK and BC are congruent. He also measures angle K and angle C and determines that they are congruent He concludes that the triangles are congruent by the SAS Congruence Theorem. Is Steve correct? If he is incorrect, which congruence theorem should Steve use? Explain your reasoning and show all of your work including measurement of angles and / o * r line segments .

asked
User Sdembla
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer:

See below

Explanation:

SAS requires two sides and the included angle to be congruent

Steve needs to measure sides EK and AC and if they are congruent, he can then complete his proof

Let's find the measure of EK and AC

  • EC =
    √((-4-4)^2 + (0-6)^2) = √(8^2 + 6^2) = √(100) = 10\\
  • AC =
    √((-2 - 6)^2 + (9 - 3)^2) = √(8^2 + 6^2) = √(100) = 10

As we see EK = AC = 10, so the proof is complete

Steve determines that sides DK and BC are congruent. He also measures angle K and-example-1
answered
User Tomasz Wysocki
by
7.9k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.